Showing posts with label Karnataka. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Karnataka. Show all posts

Friday, April 12, 2013

One in Every 10 Workers in India is a Child

The Observance of The World Day against Child Labour on 12th June has Brought back a Host of Issues behind this Social and Economic Malady. What are we doing about Child Labourers? Will The Practice Entrench itself into Perpetuity or can it be Wiped Out?

Child labour - defined as work that harms, abuses and exploits a child (aged between 5-14) or deprives a child of an education - is an ugly reality of life in India as it is in many other parts of the developing world. It is usually characterised by low or no wages, long hours, dangerous and unhealthy conditions and lack of physical and social security. The other is that these children are deprived of freedom, childhood, education, fun and play, and natural development. An official Government of India report states that child labour is ‘economically unsound, psychologically disastrous and physically as well as morally dangerous and harmful… Working children are denied their right to survival and development, education, leisure and play, and adequate standard of living, opportunity for developing personality, talents, mental and physical abilities, and protection from abuse and neglect.

India has the dubious distinction of employing the largest number of child labourers in the world. There are between 60 and 115 million working children in India - the highest number in the world (Human Rights Watch 1996 ) - with a majority of them engaged in hazardous activities like working with dangerous machinery, sharp tools and loads they are not strong or mature enough to handle. Carpet making factories, glass blowing units, matchsticks and fireworks manufacturers employ child labourers in thousands. Glass and bangle making units alone are estimated to employ over 70,000 working children.

Why is child labour so prevalent in India? Poverty is the obvious reason though not the only one. According to a 2005 World Bank estimate, 41.6% of the total Indian population falls below the international poverty line of $1.25 a day. Child labour is therefore looked upon as a source of income for poor families. A study conducted by the ILO Bureau of Statistics found that “Children’s work was considered essential to maintaining the economic level of households, either in the form of work for wages, of help in household enterprises or of household chores in order to free adult household members for economic activity elsewhere.” In some cases, the study found that a child’s income accounted for between 34% and 37% of the total household income.

The International Labour Organisation points to a strong correlation between income levels and child labour across countries, with poor countries registering high rates of child labour. According to government figures (Census 2001), over 53% of the child labour in India was accounted for by the five states - UP, AP, Rajasthan, MP and Bihar. Karnataka, Maharashtra and West Bengal together had about 20% of the child labourers in India.

Another cardinal reason for child labour is the lack of access to education. In some areas, education is not affordable, or is found to be inadequate. With no other alternatives, children spend their time working. Besides poverty and lack of education, there are also other factors that indirectly promote child labour in India. These include: Parental illiteracy, social apathy, parental ignorance regarding the bad effects of child labour, exploitation of cheap and unorganised labour, family practice of teaching traditional skills to children and ineffective child labour laws in terms of implementation.

In attempting to cure this social malaise, many developed countries have stopped importing any product from the developing countries that may have used child labour as an input. But the question arises whether banning goods made up of child labour is the remedy. Trade bans on goods produced by child labour have often had the unintended effect of forcing the children into other paid work at a lower wage and a more demeaning work condition.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Its infrastructural needs can at best be described as pathetic

UPA government’s record in augmenting its infrastructural needs can at best be described as pathetic, feels Sharad Gupta

However, the biggest blow that UPA government delivered to the infrastructure sector was to the roads. All the national highway projects have been running behind schedule – ranging from few months to five years – resulting in manifold cost escalation. And the Minister for Shipping, Road Transport and Highways, T. R. Baalu had busied himself with shuffling his officers if not kicking off controversy over the Ram Sethu.

He changed the ministry’s secretary five times, NHAI chairman four times and junior officials several times over, during the last five years. What he couldn’t change however, was the consistently falling progress of National Highway Development Programme (NHDP). It slid from 81% during 2004, the year he took over, to less than 20% in 2009, the year when he would quit office. In fact, no new projects have been awarded during the last nine months.

Things turned ugly last month when World Bank (WB) cancelled a Rs.31 billion grant for four-laning of 485-kms long NH-28 from Muzaffarpur to Lucknow. The loan was sanctioned in 2005 and the project was supposed to be completed by 2010. Even Committee on Infrastructure chaired by the Prime Minister pointed out that NHAI was taking 20 months to award a project against the scheduled time frame of five months and the project award rate is down from 70% in 2005-06 to 17% in FY 2007-08. Only 49% of work was completed under the first phase of NHDP-I in 2007-08. That is why, the first phase of the NHDP project, which was supposed to be complete by December 2007 (after several revisions), is still on. Similarly, contracts for four-laning of 811 kms were to be given in FY 2007-08 under NHDP-II but MoRTH could award contracts for only 43 km, a pathetic 5% progress. The NHAI, however, performed slightly better by achieving 51% of its target of four-laning 2,013 kms.

Contracts could be awarded for just 278 kms out of targetted 3,278 kms during FY 2007-08 under NHDP-III – a dismal 9% achievement. Progress of NHDP-V was slightly better as 882 kms work was awarded against a target of 2,995 kms – 29% achievement during FY 2007-08. The situation can be gauged from the fact that it took NHAI six years to complete a nine-kms stretch of Tumkur by-pass in Karnataka.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPMMalay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.